A bankruptcy judge decided that Johnson & Johnson’s third Chapter 11 case regarding talcum powder lawsuits will stay in Texas. The decision came after U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez of the Southern District of Texas found no strong reasons to move the case to the District of New Jersey. The judge noted that there were clear differences in the debtors and parties involved, as well as the proposed $9 billion prepackaged bankruptcy plan. Despite objections from the Coalition of Counsel for Justice for Talc Claimants and the U.S. Trustee in Houston, the judge ruled in favor of keeping the case in Texas.
This ruling marks a significant development in the ongoing legal battles surrounding Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder products. The company has faced thousands of lawsuits alleging that its talcum powder products caused cancer in users. By keeping the bankruptcy case in Texas, the legal proceedings will continue to unfold in a familiar setting for both the plaintiffs and the defendants.
In addition to the Johnson & Johnson case, other legal battles are also making headlines. For example, Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu, and Neil A. Steiner are defending Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a securities class action lawsuit. The complaint alleges that the defendants concealed information about a “toxic” mobile home portfolio and engaged in misleading practices regarding the company’s loans.
Furthermore, Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney, and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein are representing Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a securities lawsuit filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The complaint accuses the defendants of unlawfully profiting from sales of Enzolytics stock through deceptive means.
These cases highlight the complex legal landscape facing corporations and individuals involved in litigation. As legal battles continue to unfold in various courts across the country, it is essential for all parties to have competent legal representation to navigate the complexities of the legal system.
Overall, the decision to keep Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy case in Texas sets the stage for further legal proceedings in the talcum powder lawsuits. With experienced legal teams on both sides, the outcome of these cases will have far-reaching implications for the future of product liability litigation in the United States.
