The Supreme Court of Georgia has established a new artificial intelligence committee, with Justice Andrew A. Pinson as its chairperson, making him the youngest sitting jurist to hold this position. The committee’s main objective is to evaluate the risks and benefits associated with the use of Generative AI in the courts. Additionally, the committee will collaborate with the National Center for State Courts to recommend strategies that will help uphold public trust and confidence in the judicial system as AI becomes more prevalent in the future.
The committee is scheduled to convene its inaugural meeting at the Nathan Deal Judicial Center, with representatives from various classes of state courts and judicial partner agencies in attendance. The members of the committee include Justice Andrew A. Pinson as the chairperson, Judge Stephen D. Kelley as the vice-chairperson, and other distinguished individuals such as Judge Elizabeth Gobeil, Clerk Angie T. Davis, Judge Jaletta Smith, and many more.
Justice Pinson emphasized the importance of the committee’s work in educating and guiding the judiciary as they navigate the complexities of AI technology, acknowledging that there are still many unknown opportunities and threats associated with its use. The Judicial Council of Georgia, which acts as the policymaking body for the judicial branch, will provide support for the committee’s ongoing efforts.
In parallel, the State Bar of Georgia has formed its own Special Committee on Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Tools, Resources, and Legal Obligations. This committee aims to explore how the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct and Bar policy should address the use of artificial intelligence by legal practitioners. The committee will make recommendations to the Board of Governors and the Supreme Court based on its findings.
State Bar President Ivy Cadle expressed gratitude to the Judicial Council for focusing on this critical area and expressed eagerness to collaborate with the ad hoc committee. She emphasized the importance of balancing the opportunities presented by AI with the risks it poses, ensuring that the work is data-driven and prioritizes the protection of the public while enhancing the administration of justice.
Overall, the establishment of these committees reflects a proactive approach by the Georgia judicial system to adapt to the evolving landscape of technology and artificial intelligence. By addressing the challenges and opportunities presented by AI in the legal system, these committees aim to ensure that the use of technology benefits the public and upholds the integrity of the judiciary.
